Coming up at
The Wheeler Centre

See all events »

Intelligence Squared: Both Major Parties are Failing the Australian People

big_play

Dumbingdowndemocracy_medium
Dumbing Down Democracy: Tanner and Megalogenis

Tanner and Megalogenis explore politics and the media, va...

Qe_manmadeworld_medium
Quarterly Essay - Man-Made World: Choosing Between Progress and Planet

Andrew Charlton discusses the conflicting interests of we...

Wladd_medium
WikiLeaks, Assange and Defending Democracy

O'Shea, Barns, Keane, Ludlam and Dreyfus discuss the role...


As the old truism would have it, ‘Whoever you vote for, the Government always gets in’. By the close of 2010, the Australian electorate’s sense of fatigue and disillusionment was palpable. Differences between Labor and Liberal felt incremental, and the big stories seemed to centre on alternatives, from the Greens to the Independents. Have the old forces in Australian politics lost their way?

Arguing in favour of the proposition are, in order of appearance, Carmen Lawrence, Greg Barns and John Hewson.

Lawrence posits that the major parties are being reconfigured into corporations, with power wrested from dwindling party memberships into a small handful of powerbrokers. The clout of vested interests and fear-mongering are criticised heavily by a passionate Barns, while former Liberal Party leader Hewson laments that the lack of “real policy debate” and long-term vision amidst a media that has ceased to be “investigative and supportive.”

Meanwhile, arguing against the proposition are Helen Kroger, Shaun Carney and Penny Wong.

Disagreeing strongly with first speaker Lawrence, Kroger suggests that the Liberal Party’s power remains at the grassroots of its membership, invoking Sir Robert Menzies' “The Forgotten People” speech. Carney questions whether “room for improvement” equals “failure”, quoting strong unemployment and inflation figures comparative to other developed nations. Finally, Wong asks whether criticism of the major parties is merely a great Australian tradition wherein minor parties benefit from being ‘unburdened with the responsibilities of governing’.

Have modern Labor and Liberal governments shown themselves able to “govern for all, but also to govern for the national interest”, as Wong believes they should?

Speakers:

Carmen Lawrence: 0m4s
Helen Kroger: 9m20s
Greg Barns: 18m20s
Shaun Carney: 27m01s
John Hewson: 36m44s
Penny Wong: 46m06s

Topics:

Posted:

11 Apr 2011

Comments:

There are 5 comments

Tell Your Friends


TwitterTweet

5 comments so far:

Jesus H Christ. Helen Kroger, have you lost your mind? As a Young Liberal I was surprised to see you bring such a snide attack to what I thought was supposed to be a debate about ideas. I'm actually quite shocked. You should learn from the good humour and grace of Hewson... I'm afraid behaviour like that (and that anxious, angry look on your face) really doesn't do our party any great favours.

Jimmy
12 April at 11:23AM

yes mr kroger, your generation have been indoctrinated to think and behave in that way.. how sad and embarrassing for Australia's political class.

the accent is vile by the way....very annoying so sorry to say that but it's true.

janice
12 April at 03:18PM

"Mr" Kroger? Let's not get confused here.

Gender Police
12 April at 06:03PM

yep not a typo mr kroger .....it's an injoke.

ta!!

janice
13 April at 08:42PM

Helen Kroger seemed to demonstrate why people are disillusioned with the two major parties.

Sam
24 September at 11:52PM

Leave a comment:

Preview or

Tip: In your comment, you can link to a particular point in the video like this: 0m30s for the 30th second, or 4m18s for 4 minutes and 18 seconds in.


Privacy Policy | Site by Inventive Labs.