





The Australia Council for the Arts has released a new report on the publishing industry, A case for literature: the effectiveness of subsidies to Australian publishers 1995-2005.
As the title suggests the report strongly argues the case for subsidising literature citing that 884 books were subsidised between 1995-2005 with more than 60 publishers mostly “independent Australian-owned companies”.
Written by Dr Kath McLean and Dr Louise Polland, the report makes five reccomendations including increasing funding “in line with contemporary production costs, but not allow publishers to apply some part of their funds to strategic infrastructure development, including editorial capacity, conversion to digital formats, marketing and promotion”.
The Literature Board of the Australia Council will consider the report at a meeting in February 2011.
Explore by area of interest
Why do books get some sort of free pass when every other industry in Australia is being told to make its own way? We shouldn't subsidise Gunns to get out of the timber business in Tasmania any more than we should support books other than by buying them or not.
Damien
25 October at 01:14PM
Well, if you want to kick around political footballs, poorly literary nations do not become world powers and that's what Australia aspires to be.
Writing is a vocation not just a profession (yes, still in the 21st century; especially, in fact, with all the text floating around) and writers and publishing employees are some of the worst paid and undervalued workers in one of the most valuable industries.
Global media saturation has seen a decline in reading and an education gap which, like the rich-poor gap which greatly contributed to it, is a governmental issue.
Just for starters.
Jasper
25 October at 03:38PM
How should publishing be supported? With a sympathetic ear and a nice shoulder to cry on I'd say. And if that doesn't work, a firmly applied pillow to the face. It's the only kind thing to do.
Jude
25 October at 05:44PM
Damien, take a shower, mate, and then take a look at the Australia Council website. All major art and media forms receive federal funding -- it's not a 'free pass'; it's a tiny fraction of your taxes at work. The small amount of government money pumped into publishing and the like just makes some projects happen that otherwise would never get off the ground. This isn't necessarily a good thing, but it's the way it's worked for a long time. If you don't like it, at least form a coherent critique. It's got little to do with Gunns being subsidised to leave Tassie, because Gunns isn't offering any sort of cultural capital in addition to jobs; it just offers a small amount of employment, allowing it to hold a small state government to ransom. But hey, why not let the market sort it all out, or just read blogs. I'm sure the IPA will deliver.
Thanks for the considered comment, Jasper; and Jude the obscure, I'd love that shoulder, please, but a raincheck on the pillow. No need to kill the patient yet; as Damien might care to find out, a lot of publishers invest their own, non-government money in making great books because they care about them. Seems crazy, I know.
Lawrence
25 October at 06:05PM