Coming up at
The Wheeler Centre

See all events »

Monday 19 July 2010

highlight I received my first physical copy of In-human as a book and I couldn’t imagine the excitement it would bring.

It’s been such a long and hard slog to get it published that there was no joy left in it for me anymore. I didn’t think so anyway. And then I got to hold this beautiful book and I fell in love again. I went home immediately and read it from start to finish in one day. I read it like it was the first time, which sounds crazy after years of re-drafting but I could not put it down. I had to keep turning the pages to find out what was going to happen next. I didn’t expect this to happen because I’m more than familiar with all the events. But reading a bound book is, I found out, a very different experience from reading that stack of loose pages.

For me In-human is like a fairy tale – I have been able to read it countless times without ever losing the joy of it but by the last edit I was over the whole thing. And this made me sad because we’ve had such a long relationship. I started writing this novel twelve years ago. And the story continues. The novel I’m writing now, How much the human body contains, is Coralee’s take on events. She’s the antagonist in In-human and for me the hardest character to get to know, so I had to start writing this novel to find out about her.

At first (for six years) I struggled not just because In-human wasn’t finished yet, which was significant, but also because Coralee is a very dark and complicated character. Often it’s been extremely hard for me to sit with her story but in the last few weeks I had this amazing insight into what drives her and so now it’s gotten easier for me to let her speak. She’s remarkable and I hope she keeps talking. I’ve put excerpts of the first draft of the new book up on my blog so this time the first draft feels a little more public but also less lonely.

This is an edited cross post from Anna Dusk’s blog.

Topics:

Posted:

19 July 2010

Comments:

There are 0 comments so far

Related event:

Back to top

What is romance? Craig Sheborne reckons it’s about the “whoosh” then exploitation, while for Kate Holden there are only two love stories: hello and goodbye. For Hannie Rayson it was about “URST” and keeping the stars of Seachange from getting together for 39 episodes.

Posted:

19 July 2010

Comments:

There are 0 comments so far
Back to top

On Saturday Julia Gillard called the election for Saturday 21st August, to “seek a mandate from the Australian people to move Australia forward”.

The phrase “moving forward” was used more than 20 times in Gillard’s speech, has since appeared in TV ads and must be one of the fastest cliches in Australian political history.

Former Labor speechwriter, Don Watson, winced when he heard the new slogan. He told the Herald Sun “When she started trotting it out I walked away after five minutes. I couldn’t stand it any more.”

Watson has long been a hunter of weasel words and hollow phrases that have little meaning in politics. “People think the only way you can make a political point or persuade people of an argument is to treat them like imbeciles. It’s like training a dog.”

He pointed to his time as speechwriter for PM Paul Keating as being slogan-lite but policy heavy. “Keating and (ex-PM Bob) Hawke managed to sell the most radical changes to the Australian economy, the free market, to the Labor side, to the unions, without doing this messaging all the time.”

Over at Crikey, Bernard Keene characterised it as a “polished but content-free opening address” while over at the Courier Mail they’re already calling for “real straight talk” rather than a “sloganfest”.

Tony Abbott has come out with his campaign based on “real action” but also a stirring jingle imploring us to “Stand up for Australia”. The electorate is bracing itself for more cliche mongering and abuse of language.

Topics:

Posted:

19 July 2010

Comments:

There are 12 comments so far
Back to top

Channels



E-News:


Privacy Policy | Site by Inventive Labs.